Clorox, too green for environmental stewardship?
Tuesday, May 27th, 2008By Stefanie Olsen
Last week I met Suzanne Thompson, vice president of research in Clorox’s cleaning division and the material scientist who helped lead development of the company’s new line of plant-based cleaning products, Green Works. She and I shared lunch at an environmental conference, so I took the opportunity to ask her how sales were going and if the company plans to “green” other Clorox products, i.e., change formulations for non-biodegradable or synthetic goods.
No, she replied, in answer to the question of transforming existing Clorox products. Consumers need goods like bleach for home sterilization purposes, Thompson said. What’s more, she said, the demand on natural resources like Palm oil or coconut extracts used to make Green Works (which is formulated from 99 percent plant- or mineral- based ingredients) can cause shifts or shortages in food markets, much like we’re seeing with corn crops related to ethanol production.
It’s an interesting argument, one that surely holds some truth. But it’s also a typically cautious argument for a traditional consumer-package-goods company that’s in the cross hairs of a new environmental movement. (more…)
Tract homes are turning eco-chic, at least in a small town outside of London. British architecture firm Rogers Stirk Harbour & Partners has designed a 145-unit housing development in England that could be a future model for efficient housing around the world. The two-story homes, which are between 700 and 1,400 square feet, feature a modern twist on the English chimney: the Ecohat.
Egg shells, cucumber peels, fajita leftovers–they often don’t find their way into the recycling can because of the messiness and stink factor (if people even own a compost bin). In fact, food waste is the No. 1 least recycled material in the United States, according to the Environmental Protection Agency; and yet it and paper goods comprise the bulk of landfills. That waste, which can’t breakdown naturally for lack of oxygen in the landfill, adds to our global warming headaches because it produces more carbon than necessary.
Evite and greeting-card sites have seemingly done wonders for the environment with respect to saving paper. But sometimes the electronic note can’t replace a holiday card or paper invitation—especially when it comes to occasions like weddings, baby showers or graduation. Don’t sacrifice the green. Send a handmade recycled-paper card that when planted grows into a wildflower.
Can Clorox–a brand synonymous with synthetic bleach–green-ify its business? That’s an increasingly important question as major corporations known for polluting the environment try to capitalize on consumer demand for healthier, more eco-friendly goods. For example, L’Oreal, which was recently named one of the 10 worst luxury brands (story
TOKYO–”Eco” as fashion statement has definitely hit Japan’s capital–a jam-packed city of 8 million-plus, not including outlying areas.
Homeowners and future homebuyers are among those in the best position to make a difference to global warming. That’s because buildings–their energy production in heating and cooling–are the single largest contributor to global warming, producing an estimated 48 percent of the world’s heat-trapping gases, followed by the transportation industry at roughly 30 percent.
Green gifts are certainly chic this holiday. Every media outlet ranging from 
Metropolitan cities are setting the example this year on decorating with eco-Christmas lights. San Francisco this weekend, followed by Paris on Monday, lit massive holiday trees with mini light-emitting diode bulbs, which burn brighter than typical bulbs and emit no heat. The LEDs consume about 90 percent less electricity than typical lights and can last as many as 20 holiday seasons.